Focus areas for CRP
Before the winter break, I presented my focus area for the Critical Research Paper to our tutors, seeking their evaluation of my thoughts, reflections, and proposed direction. From my perspective, the presentation was far from smooth. Throughout, it became increasingly evident that there were significant issues, both in terms of the tutors' attitudes and the feedback provided. This situation led to an entanglement of thoughts in my mind, making the scope of the CRP appear excessively broad and daunting.
Initially, I was drawn to study the meanings behind objects, fueled by my keen interest in history and humanity. However, I quickly realized that this path was fraught with complexity. The historical and geographical influences that shape objects are vast and deep, presenting a challenge in terms of the weight and volume of their meanings. During my presentation feedback, Oscar astutely suggested narrowing my focus to a more tangible level. This advice resonated with me, highlighting a critical lesson in research methodology: the importance of specificity and manageability in a study's scope.
Through this experience, I've learned that my research approach can sometimes veer into what feels like empty and unproductive exploration. As a designer, I must acknowledge the limits of my expertise. While historical and sociological perspectives are invaluable, they should inform, rather than overshadow, my design-focused inquiries.
My revised research plan now involves examining specific design expressions, and understanding that design and thought trends are inextricably linked to the zeitgeist and the environmental context. A prime example is brutalist architecture, a style born from post-war necessities, fitting government needs for rapid, cost-effective rebuilding and civilian housing. Interestingly, over time, the symbolism of brutalism has evolved, particularly in socialist countries, where it has come to represent collective ideals and equality. This makes brutalist architecture an ideal case study for my research, illustrating the shift from practical to symbolic in design, a shift that mirrors the progression of human societal needs from material to spiritual fulfilment.
Conclusively, this journey with my CRP has been a profound learning experience. It has taught me the value of adaptability and specificity in research, the importance of interdisciplinary approaches, and the dynamic nature of design as a reflection of societal changes. Moving forward, I am excited to explore design like brutalist architecture not just as a design form, but as a historical narrative and a sociocultural symbol. This exploration will not only enrich my understanding of design but will also provide a solid foundation for a nuanced and impactful CRP.
